Comments on: Act and Potency http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/12/act-and-potency/ Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:24:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Manuel Labor http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/12/act-and-potency/comment-page-1/#comment-1087 Manuel Labor Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:55:12 +0000 http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/?p=220#comment-1087 My bad.... you never claimed that from Aquinas's position that Act and Potency always go together - you were speaking specifically of Arisotle. My bad….
you never claimed that from Aquinas’s position that Act and Potency always go together – you were speaking specifically of Arisotle.

]]> By: Manuel Labor http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/12/act-and-potency/comment-page-1/#comment-1086 Manuel Labor Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:54:11 +0000 http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/?p=220#comment-1086 Good post. But, Act and Potency don't always go together. In God we have 'Pure Act'. There is no potential in God that needs to be actualized. Good post.
But, Act and Potency don’t always go together.
In God we have ‘Pure Act’. There is no potential in God that needs to be actualized.

]]>