http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/09/10/thomistic-psychology/ Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:24:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/09/10/thomistic-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-72 Ben Espen Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:44:33 +0000 http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/?p=423#comment-72 Chastek is very much implying a unity between what is in the mind and the reality that is out there. However, being reality, it is richer than any one way of looking at it. Chastek is very much implying a unity between what is in the mind and the reality that is out there. However, being reality, it is richer than any one way of looking at it.

]]> http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/09/10/thomistic-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-71 Maria Pringle Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:58:18 +0000 http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/?p=423#comment-71 Thank you Ben.This article presents an interesting reflection using principles of logic and the philosophy of nature. That is, consciousness as motion from the indifferent to perception, then to concept and to a term. The idea of “binary consciousness’ is a little confusing, is the author implying a unity between what is in the mind and the reality out of the mind? To me, it points to the faculty of reasoning and being able to handle different concepts. Thank you Ben.This article presents an interesting reflection using principles of logic and the philosophy of nature. That is, consciousness as motion from the indifferent to perception, then to concept and to a term. The idea of “binary consciousness’ is a little confusing, is the author implying a unity between what is in the mind and the reality out of the mind? To me, it points to the faculty of reasoning and being able to handle different concepts.

]]>