Summative Evaluation Process for Graduate students matriculating into the program after January 15, 2013.
Optional for students matriculating into the program before January 15, 2013. See below solid line for old comprehensive exam process still available for graduate students matriculating into the program before January 15, 2013.
The Written Exam Process
- The praeses of an examining board, who is appointed by the academic dean, selects a non-authoritative text from within a student’s area of concentration or emphasis and has it sent by the Coordinator of Distance Learning to the student’s testing monitor approved by the institution. A single question is asked of the student: “What is your critical assessment of this text?” The praeses has latitude to add questions he or she feels will assist the student in responding to the prompt.
- The student is expected to read the text and give a critical theological or philosophical response that includes an explanation of the theological or philosophical habitus along with a demonstration of an ability to address the text wisely and in depth using the essential knowledge and methods of the program core alongside those of the relevant theological concentration or philosophical emphasis.
- Theology students are allowed to have an unmarked Bible but are not allowed to use notes or other materials.
- Students have as many as three hours to complete the exam.
- Each exam is read by the praeses and one other examiner appointed by the academic dean with preferred selection from among the full-time faculty.
a) If the examiners are satisfied with the results, the Coordinator of Distance Learning will schedule an oral exam led by the praeses and the second examiner. The oral exam will take place no sooner than two weeks following the successful completion of the written exam.
b) If the praeses and second examiner are dissatisfied with the results, they will mark the areas where the student demonstrated an inadequate response, and this assessment will be conveyed to the student for purposes of scheduling a second chance examination. A third and final chance can be scheduled at the discretion of the academic dean.
The Oral Exam Process
The one-hour oral exam is done either on campus or via video conferencing with a webcam open on the student. The hour is parsed in this way:
1) The praeses of the examining board begins with brief prayer and proceeds to questions based on a list of core program topics along with topics in the student’s area of concentration or emphasis.
2) The praeses and second examiner may each question the student for up to 30 minutes, after which the student will be invited to leave the conference.
3) When the examiners have agreed on the results, the praeses will call the student back (into the room or into the conference call) and announce the results.
4) In case of failure, the praeses will tell the student which areas require further study and schedule a make-up exam. In case of failure in the make-up exam, a third and final chance may be scheduled at the discretion of the academic dean.
5) The praeses will communicate the results of the exam to the academic dean.
Guidelines for Faculty on Oral Exam Questions
- The examiners will draw their oral examination questions from the program core and from the concentration or emphasis areas. Students will be responsible in the oral exam for demonstrating a working knowledge of all topics in the core and of all topics in their concentration areas.
- Examiners may also ask questions concerning pastoral application consonant with our mission to cultivate Catholic leaders for evangelization.
Orientation Course for Students Preparing to take the Comprehensive Exam
- A zero-credit orientation course, facilitated by the Director of Distance Learning or another member of the faculty assigned to oversee it, will provide students with a sample non-authoritative document drawn from each program.
- Students are to register in the orientation class at the beginning of the semester in which they plan to take the exams. Only those students enrolled in the orientation class each term are eligible to take their exams during that term.
- The orientation course will include a list of topics given to the students at the start of their studies. These topics are drawn from the core and from the concentration or emphasis areas. Students are responsible in the oral exam for demonstrating a working knowledge of all topics in the core and of all topics in their concentration areas.
Examination Process for Graduate students matriculating into the program before January 15, 2013.
The comprehensive examination for the Holy Apostles College and Seminary Distance Learning Program for a Master of Arts in Philosophy must be taken prior to graduation. Before you will be allowed to sit for the examination, you must complete all your course work, and, if applicable, complete your thesis.
Inform the Distance Learning Coordinator of your choice for a Testing Monitor. Make sure the testing monitor is aware that this examination is given over a six hour time period – three hours in the morning, a one hour break for lunch, and two hours in the afternoon. Prior to taking your exam, you will be mailed an invoice for $80 to cover the comprehensive examination fee. Upon receipt of your completed exam, Holy Apostles College and Seminary will send a check for $75 to your testing monitor.
Inform the Distance Learning Coordinator of your choice for a “major” from (1) Philosophy of Nature & Metaphysics, (2) Ethics, (3) History of Philosophy, or (4) Human Nature. The examination will consist of three questions in your major area, and one question in each of the other three disciplines. There will be some choice in the questions (e.g., you will choose three questions in your major area out of four or five questions that will be given to you).
Have enough knowledge to write for 45 minutes on each of the questions in your major area, and 30 minutes in each of the questions in the other three areas. The additional time given to you in your examination can be used to think about your answers and to check them.
Philosophy of Nature / Metaphysics
- In the Aristotelian tradition there are two places within the philosophy of nature at which we are driven to affirm meta-physical being. Explain and discuss.
- Discuss the question of proving the existence of God.
- Aristotelian-Thomist metaphysics understands being as divisible into act and potency in two (Aristotle), and then in three (Thomas) different ways. Explain.
- Explain the importance of the analogy of being in metaphysics.
- Aristotle taught that the highest genera of material being are expressed in ten “categories.” Discuss.
- Explain the three degrees or levels of abstraction and their relevance to philosophy of nature/metaphysics.
- What are the “transcendental concepts of being?”
- How does Aristotle go about establishing the “end” of man and how does this contribute to Ethics?
- Discuss the “four cardinal virtues” – their nature, their derivation, etc.
- According to St. Thomas there are four kinds of law. Explain and discuss their interrelationship.
- Discuss the issue of conscience and its role in the moral life.
- What is the rule of “double effect?” Explain how it is necessary to any ethics that holds that there are absolute prohibitions or obligations, and discuss the limits of its applicability.
- Explain and discuss the critique of “consequentialism,” (taking into account the teaching of Veritatis Splendor).
- What are the “three fonts of morality?”
History of Philosophy
- Discuss the legacy of Parmenides in Western thought.
- Explain and discuss the validity of St. Anselm’s famous “Ontological Argument.”
- Ancient and Medieval philosophy, and perhaps the whole history of Western philosophy to the present day, can be said to be dominated by the contrast and tension between Plato and Aristotle. Comment at length.
- Discuss the importance of Kant.
- Descartes is often called the “father of modern philosophy.” How is this so?
- How, in detail, does the “modern project” differ from that of the Ancients, and how is it definitive for modern philosophies as different as empiricism and rationalism? Use specific examples.
- The “Pre-Socratic Philosophers” have enjoyed a revival of popularity in Nietzsche and Heidegger. What is this about? In any case, selecting at least three of them, discuss their importance for the ensuing philosophical history.
- Discuss Cartesian Dualism in relation to our understanding of man.
- Discuss arguments for the immortality of the (human) soul.
- What does it mean to talk about the human person?
- What is free will and do human beings possess it?
- Aided by the philosophy of nature Thomas distinguishes various “levels of soul” in the human being, and then various “powers,” etc. Describe them.
- Can philosophy discern any meaning in human history?
- Respond to the following quote from a well-known contemporary philosopher:
In explaining knowing, “according to Aristotle the mind participated in the being of the known object, rather than simply depicting it….But this theory totally depends on the philosophy of forms. Once one no longer explains the way things are in terms of the species that inform them, this conception of knowledge is untenable and rapidly becomes close to unintelligible. We have great difficulty in understanding it today.”