<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dead Philosophers Society &#187; Useless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/tag/useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Uselessness of Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/23/the-uselessness-of-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/23/the-uselessness-of-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Espen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I am asked what I am going to &#8220;do&#8221; with a Masters Degree in Philosophy. My usual reply is &#8220;nothing&#8221;.

Classical political philosophy, in addition to Aristotle&#8217;s discussion of wit and humor in Book Four of his Ethics, could be amusing. Take the question of whether philosophy itself is &#8220;useless&#8221;. Of course, there are two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Sometimes I am asked what I am going to &#8220;do&#8221; with a Masters Degree in Philosophy. My usual reply is &#8220;nothing&#8221;.</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Classical political philosophy, in addition to Aristotle&#8217;s discussion of wit and humor in Book Four of his Ethics, could be amusing. Take the question of whether philosophy itself is &#8220;useless&#8221;. Of course, there are two meanings to the word &#8220;useless&#8221; &#8212; one would be that the thing is worth nothing at all, the other that something is beyond the criterion of &#8220;use&#8221; or utility.</div>
<div>-James V. Schall, S. J. Roman Catholic Political Philosophy</div>
</blockquote>
<div>I do &#8220;do&#8221; something with my philosophy, I offer <a href="http://www.benespen.com/lectures/">lectures</a> twice a year on philosophical subjects, I have my own webpage, but first and foremost I just enjoy the knowing, and find myself better because of it. I suppose I am strange that way.</div>
<div>Cross-posted to <a href="http://www.benespen.com/journal/2009/5/23/the-uselessness-of-philosophy.html" target="_blank">With Both Hands</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadphilosopherssociety.com/2009/05/23/the-uselessness-of-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
